Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. Hindman, Matthew Scott, The myth of digital democracy / Matthew Hindman. p. cm. The Myth of Digital Democracy. Matthew Hindman . From law to public policy, democratic theory to party politics, interest in the Internet has begun from the. The Myth of Digital Democracy has 73 ratings and 11 reviews. Maru said: Mentioned in this excellent article in the NYT on the influence of the internet o.
|Published (Last):||14 November 2014|
|PDF File Size:||19.48 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.54 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Trivia About The Myth of Digit An engaging and thorough analysis of the alleged democratization of politics through the internet.
Or are you using it as a PDF reader? The arguments for the buzz-worded democratization that is mostly mentioned is the inherent infrastructure and equality of the Web, but really, there was always going to be optimism, because it is a new technology, more advanced than ever before. While I think the argument made by Hindman has a bunch of holes in it because he only looks at the issue from one perspective traditional political scienceI still learned a number of things about the internet in general by reading about Hindman’s studies.
James rated it liked it Aug 06, He finds that while the Internet has increased eemocracy forms of political participation and transformed the way interest groups and candidates organize, mobilize, and raise funds, elites still strongly shape how political material on the Web is presented and accessed.
Thanks for telling us about the problem. What it comes down to is this: That level of readership is large by the standards of traditional opinion journals, such as the Nation, the New Republic, or the National Review, all myh which are minor print publications.
The plastic utopianism of Silicon Valley has been a nice current of bits surrounding us for the past couple of decades. The Internet’s successes at democratizing politics are real.
The audience is clear! Is the Internet democratizing American politics?
Greg rated it really liked it May 21, His concept of the political is rather narrow, and could be expanded to include blogs and other media that provide critical commentary on social issues but do cover such traditional poli sci topics as governance, elections etc. People online tend to be more rude and less emphatic in their communications, because they forget that they are not talking to a machine but to another human being. So the specific claim here is that the Internet is increasing the volume of citizens talking to each other — which is a vital democratic activity particularly if they are talking to the people they disagree with.
The Myth of Digital Democracy by Matthew Hindman
His work is very quantitative and many of the statistical models are over my head, but his conclusion is still clear: Jan 30, Vera rated it really liked it Shelves: Still, there are limits to what the openness of blogging culture can accomplish. Well researched, even if some of his theories are a bit wonky. At least three of the ten bloggers-Marshall, Reynolds, and Ymth the children of academics. Return to Book Page.
The Myth of Digital Democracy – Matthew Hindman – Google Books
Reading list — part greatest hits and some newer entries May 29, 0 comments views. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. PDFs are mainly good — and I like the way you can email them to yourself so its really easy to add content.
A nice book about Hindman’s research into whether digital media is promoting democracy. This post is a Dave Briggs appreciation post for two reasons — one is that I promised him I would read and blog about this book and I am a woman of my word and the other is that its thanks to him that I read it on my shiny new Kindle.
The Myth of Digital Democracy
However, it would certainly be interesting to see data that tried to calibrate any change that has already happened. The problem, perhaps, lies in the association of speed with progress, in the idea of technological progress as a catalyst for societal progress. Jan 24, Brian Indrelunas rated it it was amazing Shelves: Hopes for the Internet were so high, that we cannot allow ourselves to admit that perhaps it does not dkgital up to its ambition, that perhaps the Internet, just as every other sphere of human interactions, is bound to our inherent social values, is not devoid of evil, greed and deception, and does not fuel equality.
Maddie Duhon rated it really liked it Jan 18, To ask other readers questions about The Myth of Digital Democracyplease sign up.